RE: filesystemio_options setting
- From: Josh Collier <Josh.Collier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Dave.Herring@xxxxxxxxxx" <Dave.Herring@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roman Podshivalov <roman.podshivalov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:31:50 -0700
With parallelism the blocks are read into the PGA. Perhaps it was undersized.
Setall is going to try to use both directio and asyncio. You should verify by
trussing the your db process that async io is working correctly.
Directio and asyncio are commonly confused. Its my understanding that the VxFS
supports directio but not async, unless you have the ODM or QuickIO option$.
Direct i/o bypasses the filesystem cache and requires resizing of the pga and
the sga to compensate for this.
Ansync i/o uses KAIO calls instead of pread calls to initiate asyncronous i/o.
Even with SETALL, you are not guranteed to get async reads unless parallelism
is invoked. Traditional single process reads will show up as "db file scattered
reads", these won't be async. "direct path reads" are async reads. I've
verified this with truss. With SETALL most of your writes will be async by
default.
Some OS (such as solaris 10) mimic async i/o with a series of threaded
syncronous reads, when the dabatase is set to use async. The db issues a KAIO
call, the OS recoginizes this, returns a small error and then initiates the LWP
threaded sync read calls.
Josh C.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Herring Dave - dherri
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:50 AM
To: Roman Podshivalov
Cc: john40855@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: filesystemio_options setting
All true, but I didn't mention (thought it wasn't to the original point) that
nearly all objects involved in our CTAS statements have parallelism set, so no
cache will be used, database nor filesystem, assuming DIRECTIO is set.
Maybe I'll get some time and test this thoroughly and post the results.
Dave
___________________________________
Dave Herring, DBA | A c x i o m M I C S / C S O
630-944-4762 office | 630-430-5988 wireless | 630-944-4989 fax
________________________________________
From: Roman Podshivalov [mailto:roman.podshivalov@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:43 AM
To: Herring Dave - dherri
Cc: john40855@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: filesystemio_options setting
Dave,
If you set filesystemio_option to SETALL, DIRECTIO is not guaranteed because
your underlaying filesystem might not support it. VxFS for example. In case of
Veritas - ODM or Quick IO products have to be used to really enable direct IO.
Many other filesystems have to be mounted with special options to enable direct
IO. But this is completely different subject 8-)
Back to the original - once you really enabled direct IO - filesystem cache
will be bypassed and many Oracle blocks read from the FS won't be cached in the
memory. To mitigate that you have to grow the SGA, or buffer cache more
specifically, to reserve the space for those blocks, that were previously
cached in the FS cache, but not in the SGA.
BTW same stands true for databases migrated from filesystem to ASM. In many
cases buffer cache/SGA needs to be expanded. This situation was discussed on
multiple OOW sessions back in the days when ASM was introduced.
--romas
On 5/14/08, Herring Dave - dherri <Dave.Herring@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We ran into a related problem on RHEL 4 and 10.2.0.2. After changing from
ASYNCH to SETALL, after some amount of time CTAS statements were dragging along
at 50 MB/s. After changing back to ASYNCH the same statements ran at 400 MB/s.
Changing back again to SETALL caused those same statements, after running for
x amount of time, to gradually drop again to 50 MB/s.
I've never had time to fully investigate this, so I can't say for sure that
SETALL was the culprit but it sure seemed that way after a few, basic tests.
This behavior is opposite of what I would have expected, as it seemed that the
addition of DIRECTIO seemed to slowly fill up something, killing throughput.
Yet DIRECTIO should be bypassing filesystem cache so it shouldn't be affected
by any memory-related setting. Trying to explain this now has me REALLY
curious as to what was happening. Great, more work!
Dave
___________________________________
Dave Herring, DBA | A c x i o m M I C S / C S O
630-944-4762 office | 630-430-5988 wireless | 630-944-4989 fax
________________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of John Smith
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:19 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: filesystemio_options setting
Hi. We are running oracle 10.2.0.3 on our test evironment in suse 9. Emc
symmetrix storage. I was going over the settings and discovered that
filesystemio_options was not set (no value given). I changed it to setall per
the Oracle documentation for Linux. Shortly after that, our queries suddenly
started running longer, and the culprit appears to be disk IO.
I understood that this setting could not cause a problem, and all the Oracle
documentation I could find said to set this value to setall in 10.2.0.3. I
unset the value and the problem went away. Can someone shed some light on this?
*************************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended
only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please resend this
communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it
from your computer system.
Thank you.
*************************************************************************
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: filesystemio_options setting
- From: Finn Jorgensen
- References:
- RE: filesystemio_options setting
- From: Herring Dave - dherri
Other related posts:
- » filesystemio_options setting
- » RE: filesystemio_options setting
- » Re: filesystemio_options setting
- » RE: filesystemio_options setting
- » RE: filesystemio_options setting
- » Re: filesystemio_options setting
- » Re: filesystemio_options setting
- » Re: filesystemio_options setting
- » Re: filesystemio_options setting
- » RE: filesystemio_options setting
- » Re: filesystemio_options setting
- » Re: filesystemio_options setting
- Re: filesystemio_options setting
- From: Finn Jorgensen
- RE: filesystemio_options setting
- From: Herring Dave - dherri