RE: enq: TX - index contention
- From: "Hollis, Les" <Les.Hollis@xxxxxx>
- To: "K Gopalakrishnan" <kaygopal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:08:39 -0600
Then explain to me why a "select ini_trans from user_tables where
table_name =3D 'JUNKY1'; " returns a result of =20
INI_TRANS
__________
1
On a table I just created
And I guess ALL of Oracle's Documentation is wrong......Training courses
both 9.0 and 9.2, The Online documentation for create table which
contains THIS:
If you omit this clause, then Oracle uses the following default values:
PCTFREE: 10=20
PCTUSED: 40=20
INITRANS: 1=20
MAXTRANS: Depends on data block size
AND the Oracle Press Oracle 9i DBA Handbook on page 881 under create
table....
You're telling me that ALL of that documentation PLUS the actual results
of a select statement are wrong.
Not buying it.
-----Original Message-----
From: K Gopalakrishnan [mailto:kaygopal@xxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:56 AM
To: Hollis, Les
Cc: mark.powell@xxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: enq: TX - index contention
Les:
The documentation is incorrect. Just do a blockdump and see the
ini_trans. It is very simple to test.
--=20
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan=20
Co-Author: Oracle Wait Interface, Oracle Press 2004
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/007222729X/
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: enq: TX - index contention
- From: K Gopalakrishnan
Other related posts:
- » enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- Re: enq: TX - index contention
- From: K Gopalakrishnan