Re: enq: TX - index contention
- From: K Gopalakrishnan <kaygopal@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Les.Hollis@xxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:26:04 +0530
Les:
The documentation is incorrect. Just do a blockdump and see the
ini_trans. It is very simple to test.
--
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan
Co-Author: Oracle Wait Interface, Oracle Press 2004
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/007222729X/
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: enq: TX - index contention
- From: Hollis, Les
Other related posts:
- » enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- RE: enq: TX - index contention
- From: Hollis, Les