Re: enq: TX - index contention
- From: K Gopalakrishnan <kaygopal@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Les.Hollis@xxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:05:00 +0530
Les:
I think you are totally confused here. ITLs work at block level. Not
at segment level. Just for your understanding about ITLs and
Datablocks /transactions have a look at this note.
http://www.revealnet.com/newsletter/Transaction%20Management.htm
--
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan
Co-Author: Oracle Wait Interface, Oracle Press 2004
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/007222729X/
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: enq: TX - index contention
- From: K Gopalakrishnan
- References:
- RE: enq: TX - index contention
- From: Hollis, Les
Other related posts:
- » enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » RE: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- » Re: enq: TX - index contention
- Re: enq: TX - index contention
- From: K Gopalakrishnan
- RE: enq: TX - index contention
- From: Hollis, Les