Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: sharmakdeep_oracle@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:54:13 -0500
Now now Deepak, don't go about and start logging bugs about Oracle
generously using RULE hint in various views etc.
C'mon .. give them a break ... some of dem developers haven't yet read
the manuals that say
1. rule is deprecated, don't use it
and (my favorite)
2. don't use long, use CLOB.
he he he he 8:)
Raj
On 3/29/06, Deepak Sharma <sharmakdeep_oracle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree that Oracle must have a reason to put that
> hint in, but I need to confirm if it is expected
> behaviour or a Bug.
>
--
----------------------------------------------
Got RAC?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Riyaj Shamsudeen
- References:
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Deepak Sharma
Other related posts:
- » dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Riyaj Shamsudeen
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Deepak Sharma