Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Deepak Sharma <sharmakdeep_oracle@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:35:42 -0800 (PST)
I tried, _optimizer_ignore_hints to true, at
session-level and ran the dbms_stats again, but still
see the hints in there. Listed below are 3 different
SQLs that were generated during the first few minutes:
Case 1 (Good):
==
INSERT /*+ append */INTO SYS.ora_temp_1_ds_58831
SELECT /*+ parallel(t,16) parallel_index(t,16)
dbms_stats cursor_sharing_exact use_weak_name_resl
dynamic_sampling(0) no_monitoring */
<other lines>
Case 2 (Good):
==
SELECT SUBSTRB (DUMP (val, 16, 0, 32), 1, 120) ep,
cnt
FROM (SELECT /*+ parallel(t,16)
parallel_index(t,16) dbms_stats cursor_sharing_exact
use_weak_name_resl dynamic_sampling(0) no_monitoring
*/
<other lines>
Case 3 (NOT Good - Uses no_parallel_index hint):
==
SELECT /*+ no_parallel_index(t,"TYPE_P_BIX")
dbms_stats cursor_sharing_exact use_weak_name_resl
dynamic_sampling(0) no_monitoring no_expand
index(t,"TYPE_P_BIX") */
COUNT (DISTINCT sys_op_lbid (8752793, 'R',
t.ROWID)) AS nrw,
COUNT (DISTINCT sys_op_lbid (8752793, 'L',
t.ROWID)) AS nlb,
COUNT (DISTINCT "TYPE_KEY") AS ndk, NULL AS clf
FROM "D1"."D1_FACT" t
WHERE tbl$or$idx$part$num ("D1"."D1_FACT", 0, 3, 0,
"ROWID") = :objn
--- Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you are on Oracle 10
> AND
> you are adventurous
> you could set _optimizer_ignore_hints to true.
>
> Although I suppose Oracle has a reason for explxitly
> putting the
> no_parallel_index hint in the sql.
>
> Quoting Deepak Sharma
> <sharmakdeep_oracle@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Even with specifying DEGREE=4, the dbms_stats
> > internally generates this Hint to use
> > no_parallel_index when processing the Indexes for
> the
> > table being analyzed. Any ways to force it to use
> > parallel or NOT TO USE no_parallel_index hint? I
> have
> > tried 'alter session enable parallel query', but
> still
> > produced the same.
> >
> > SELECT /*+ no_parallel_index(t,"DT_P_BIX")
> dbms_stats
> > cursor_sharing_exact use_weak_name_resl
> > dynamic_sampling(0) no_monitoring no_expand
> > index(t,"DT_P_BIX") */
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
- References:
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
Other related posts:
- » dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- » Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
- Re: dbms_stats using no_parallel_index internally
- From: Wolfgang Breitling