Re: db block size
- From: Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:08:59 -0400
On 06/21/2004 06:36:51 AM, Nuno Souto wrote:
> Mladen Gogala apparently said,on my timestamp of 21/06/2004 3:50 PM:
> I'd qualify that by including: "with raw data files".
> With anything other than that, the I/O size is pretty much
> fixed to what the f/s thinks is best and there is very little
Agreed. You are right, once again. Are you Pete Sharman's alter ego?
--
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: db block size
- From: Nuno Souto
- References:
- RE: db block size
- From: Pete Sharman
- Re: db block size
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Re: db block size
- From: Nuno Souto
Other related posts:
- » db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » RE: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- » Re: db block size
- Re: db block size
- From: Nuno Souto
- RE: db block size
- From: Pete Sharman
- Re: db block size
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Re: db block size
- From: Nuno Souto