RE: cost
- From: "Cary Millsap" <cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:34:51 -0500
Yep, "bug" is where we're going with it... But we haven't had time yet
to go into detail.
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *
Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 4/6 Seattle, 5/7 Dallas, 5/18 New Jersey
- SQL Optimization 101: 4/19 Denver, 5/3 Boston, 5/24 San Diego
- Hotsos Symposium 2005: March 6-10 Dallas
- Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bobak, Mark
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:24 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: cost
Hmm....I should have known, Cary...;-)
I actually had the thought, as I was typing that reply "hmm....*always*,
really? Are you sure? Yeah, of course you are, if it's not always
choosing the lowest cost, what else could it do....?" Of course, Oracle
found a way.....
My first thought, though, would be that this is a bug.....is that where
you're going with this? Or is there something more going on? Did 10053
reveal anything interesting?
-Mark
Mark J. Bobak
Oracle DBA
ProQuest Company
Ann Arbor, MI
"Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc"
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
