cardinality in query plans?
- From: <ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 8:50:35 -0500
I'm doing a two table join and both tables are analyzed. Oracle is incorrectly
choosing a full tables scan over an index search(I tested it, index search has
1/4 the logical I/Os).
When I see the cardinality for the full tablescan I see 262,000. However, when
I do a count(*) of the table or check num_rows in dba_tables I see 870,000
records. I'm assuming this is why Oracle is choosing the full table scan.
table is analyzed as follows:
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(cascade=>true).
this interesting part is that when I use bind variables Oracle chooses the
proper plan. Any ideas?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cardinality in query plans?
- From: Jonathan Lewis
- Re: cardinality in query plans?
- From: Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco
Other related posts:
- » cardinality in query plans?
- » Re: cardinality in query plans?
- » Re: cardinality in query plans?
- » Re: cardinality in query plans?
- » Re: cardinality in query plans?
- Re: cardinality in query plans?
- From: Jonathan Lewis
- Re: cardinality in query plans?
- From: Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco