RE: brain dead

From: "Michael Fontana" <mfontana@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>, <tim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:02:12 -0600 (CST)

Great article.  Interesting historical perspective.  Someone must have had
a crystal ball looking into the future.  

 

  _____  

From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:51 PM
To: tim@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l
Subject: Re: brain dead

 

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Tim Gorman <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Niall,

As far as the SERVICE_NAMES parameter, I'm not sure why the document likes
to identify each of the instances/nodes as separate services (i.e.
CHICAGO1, CHICAGO2, BOSTON1, BOSTON2, etc).  Personally, I've always
tended to match the SERVICE_NAMES to the DB_NAME, unless I'm trying to do
something fancy like host multiple applications within ...


Jeremy Schneider has a good paper on the history and use of SERVICE_NAMES

http://www.ardentperf.com/pub/services-schneider07.pdf

Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

References:

Re: brain dead
From: Jared Still

RE: brain dead

Other related posts: