RE: boycott Microsoft
- From: "Boivin, Patrice J" <BoivinP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 10:22:26 -0400
Update on the 'net... SCO acknowledged that the memo is genuine, but they
say it was taken out of context.
Microsoft say they are paying SCO for a legitimate service, but are not
funeling funds to them surreptitiously.
Pat.
-----Original Message-----
From: Whittle Jerome Contr NCI [mailto:Jerome.Whittle@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: March 4, 2004 3:23 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: boycott Microsoft
An email sent by an anonymous whistleblower to a biased source who cannot
certify its authenticity.
That's not what I call proof.
Jerry Whittle
ASIFICS DBA
NCI Information Systems Inc.
jerome.whittle@xxxxxxxxxxxx
618-622-4145
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Drake [SMTP:discgolfdba@xxxxxxxxx]
http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html
<http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html>
"There you have it. A hundred million funnelled from
Microsoft to SCO, of which they have $68.5 million
left. Their 10Qs reveal that every other line of cash
inflow is statistical noise by comparison. The brave
new SCOsource business model is now clear: sue your
customers, shill for Microsoft, kite your stock, and
pray you stay out of jail."
I hope that the EU comes down so hard against
Microsoft that they practically have to close up shop
in Europe.
If this is not anti-trust, restraint of trade, I don't
know what is.
Pd
IANAL
Help someone else learn to use Linux today.
Other related posts:
