RE: automatic undo 100% used
- From: "Gogala, Mladen" <MGogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:25:13 -0500
Paula, UNDO segments are created automa[t|g]ically in an UNDO tablespace.
They are
the same good old rollback segments that you know and love from the previous
versions,
only created automatically. They should never be truncated. System may
offline some
of them in the times of plenty (low system activity), but the space should
NEVER be released.
The worst thing imaginable, from the performance point of view, is to have
the instance do dynamic
space allocation. If the space is allocated, that is because it was needed.
If you de-allocate it,
it will be allocated again at some point, probably the least convenient one
at that. That's Murphy.
You want to have a leeway for the segments to extend, so you should always
have enough free
space to accommodate an additional segment. All of your DBA tables are still
there and they still
apply. V$rollstat is replaced by v$undostat, but that's it.
--
Mladen Gogala
Ext. 121
_____
From: Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 2:08 PM
To: MGogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: automatic undo 100% used
Mladen, I know you ask a lot of questions. Seriously, is this how undo
segments work - is 100% of the tablespace allocated showing actually mean
that that much space is really being used? Is there any problems with undo
segments (automatic) not actually releasing
_____
From: Gogala, Mladen [mailto:MGogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:59 PM
To: Stankus, Paula G; davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: automatic undo 100% used
Your logic would push storage manufacturers into recession.
Don't you have any compassion for the poor workers in India and Malaysia?
You are supposed to buy more disks and not ask any questions.
--
Mladen Gogala
Ext. 121
-----Original Message-----
From: Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:16 PM
To: davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: automatic undo 100% used
Have 3Gb allocated for undo retention, a few batch processes and
tablespace is showing 100% full. Is this normal behavior? I am used to
old rollback segments where it would be and likely revolve around poorly
written batch processes.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
<http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l>
_____
size=2 width="100%" align=center>
Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 18450725) is spam:
Spam
<https://dohsmsi01.doh.state.fl.us/canit/b.php?c=s&i=18450725&m=08a37a1e8029
>
Not
<https://dohsmsi01.doh.state.fl.us/canit/b.php?c=n&i=18450725&m=08a37a1e8029
> spam
Forget
<https://dohsmsi01.doh.state.fl.us/canit/b.php?c=f&i=18450725&m=08a37a1e8029
> previous vote
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts: