Re: artificial values vs null
- From: "Nuno Souto" <nsouto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 21:55:13 +1000
That's funny. I've seen exactly the opposite
when using NULL to mean current of anything.
Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Foote" <richard.foote@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> I've seen on quite a number of occasions the damage that "artificial"
> values
> can do in stuffing up Oracle's assumption of range value distributions and
> hence Oracle's ability to select an appropriate execution plan.
>
> Setting end dates to some distant future is full of dangers and is a
> classic
> example.
>
> Beware indeed !!
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: My 10 Commandments of Database Administration...
- From: Stephane Faroult
- Re: My 10 Commandments of Database Administration...
- From: Nuno Souto
- artificial values vs null
- From: Niall Litchfield
- Re: artificial values vs null
- From: Richard Foote
Other related posts:
- » artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » RE: artificial values vs null
- » RE: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » RE: artificial values vs null
- » RE: artificial values vs null
- » RE: artificial values vs null
- » RE: artificial values vs null
- » RE: artificial values vs null
- » RE: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- » Re: artificial values vs null
- Re: My 10 Commandments of Database Administration...
- From: Stephane Faroult
- Re: My 10 Commandments of Database Administration...
- From: Nuno Souto
- artificial values vs null
- From: Niall Litchfield
- Re: artificial values vs null
- From: Richard Foote