RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
- From: "Khedr, Waleed" <Waleed.Khedr@xxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:31:49 -0400
So you have average row size =3D 1 ?
Waleed
-----Original Message-----
From: ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx [mailto:ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 10:27 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
We have a table which is about 8GB with about 8 billion records. We add =
deltas to the file daily(inserts,updates,deletes).
We are considering paritioning this table so we can use parallel DML. We =
are considering partitioning on the primary key to about 10-20 =
partitions.=20
Has anyone used hash sub-partitioning? What are your experiences with =
that? I'd like to have granularity smaller than 400-800 MB per =
partition.=20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
