Re: anyone else get told they have to wait 4 months for a bug fix?
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 16:11:01 +0100
On Mon, 24 May 2004 10:56:28 -0400, ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx
<ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is in production... and we transport large tablespaces daily. Can you
> believe this? We will have serious interruptions in service.
Yes I can believe this. Do you really want Oracle to modify core parts
of the system quickly and on a one-off basis. Would the resulting db
be upgradeable to 9206 or to 10? Are you confident that the testing of
a one off pack is as thorough as the testing for a patchset for all
customers and all platforms?
In the meantime the 2 available workarounds appear clear.
1. Don't use RAC.
2. Use windows not *nix.
:(
One of these workarounds may make more sense than the other....
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
