Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- From: "Alex Gorbachev" <ag@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Dan Norris" <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:39:33 -0400
I will list some pros and cons - if anyone feels like adding some more
- by all means, please do.
With shared Oracle home
- You are guaranteed to have the same patches on both nodes and use
actually the same binaries.
- It's supposedly easier to manage (was a disaster in 9i though)
especially on large RAC installations (by number of nodes).
I'm a bit skeptical as it requires some CFS or NFS to manage and it's
yet another software stack if you are not using it as your primary
database storage as well.
My arguments for non-shared homes:
- local filesystem is way simpler and rock solid.
- if you screwed up something on one node - it is not propagated on
another node (have you had someone wiping out the oracle homes
completely? One SA sis that clean up for me once).
- it's easier to apply rolling patches. Otherwise, for shared home it
would require new home installation and re-register databases and
instances. In the end, I'm actually not sure if that will be "online"
in the end.
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Alex
On 7/10/07, Dan Norris <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FWIW, I'm in the same boat--"it depends", but I have very rarely heard
compelling arguments for using a shared OH. I just talked with another
customer this morning that is very much looking forward to their 9i->10g RAC
upgrade/migration so that they can eliminate the shared OH from their
environment.
Dan
----- Original Message ----
From: Alex Gorbachev <ag@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: randyjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:51:57 PM
Subject: Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
Well, there are two groups - some believe that shared oracle homes are
better from manageability and reliability and others prefer non-shared
installations.
Both have their arguments and there is a third group that would say
"it depends". I probably belong to the third group but lean more
towards non-shared homes as a more reliable option.
On 7/10/07, Randy Johnson <randyjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Good tip on the shared filesystem for the oraInventory. Sharing the
> oraInventory across nodes is not a good practice in my opinion. It runs
> counter to the whole concept of redundancy in an HA configuration and RAC
> was not written to support it.
--
Alex Gorbachev, Oracle DBA Brewer, The Pythian Group
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alex http://www.oracloid.com
BAAG party - www.BattleAgainstAnyGuess.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
- From: Closson, Kevin A
- RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
- From: Randy Johnson
- References:
- Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- From: Dan Norris
Other related posts:
- » add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- » RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
FWIW, I'm in the same boat--"it depends", but I have very rarely heard compelling arguments for using a shared OH. I just talked with another customer this morning that is very much looking forward to their 9i->10g RAC upgrade/migration so that they can eliminate the shared OH from their environment. Dan ----- Original Message ---- From: Alex Gorbachev <ag@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: randyjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:51:57 PM Subject: Re: add node , oracle software a bit error Well, there are two groups - some believe that shared oracle homes are better from manageability and reliability and others prefer non-shared installations. Both have their arguments and there is a third group that would say "it depends". I probably belong to the third group but lean more towards non-shared homes as a more reliable option. On 7/10/07, Randy Johnson <randyjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Good tip on the shared filesystem for the oraInventory. Sharing the > oraInventory across nodes is not a good practice in my opinion. It runs > counter to the whole concept of redundancy in an HA configuration and RAC > was not written to support it.
- RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
- From: Closson, Kevin A
- RE: add node , oracle software a bit error
- From: Randy Johnson
- Re: add node , oracle software a bit error
- From: Dan Norris