Re: add node , oracle software a bit error

FWIW, I'm in the same boat--"it depends", but I have very rarely heard 
compelling arguments for using a shared OH. I just talked with another customer 
this morning that is very much looking forward to their 9i->10g RAC 
upgrade/migration so that they can eliminate the shared OH from their 
environment. 

Dan

----- Original Message ----
From: Alex Gorbachev <ag@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: randyjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:51:57 PM
Subject: Re: add node , oracle software a bit error

Well, there are two groups - some believe that shared oracle homes are
better from manageability and reliability and others prefer non-shared
installations.

Both have their arguments and there is a third group that would say
"it depends". I probably belong to the third group but lean more
towards non-shared homes as a more reliable option.

On 7/10/07, Randy Johnson <randyjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Good tip on the shared filesystem for the oraInventory. Sharing the
> oraInventory across nodes is not a good practice in my opinion. It runs
> counter to the whole concept of redundancy in an HA configuration and RAC
> was not written to support it.

-- 
Alex Gorbachev, Oracle DBA Brewer, The Pythian Group
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alex http://www.oracloid.com
BAAG party - www.BattleAgainstAnyGuess.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: