RE: a quick poll regarding the 11gR2 OFA
- From: "Pankaj Jain" <pjain@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 10:04:21 -0400
So what is the general consensus now ?
Kellyn : would you be kind enough to summarize.
Regards
-Pankaj
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Bach
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 4:46 AM
To: cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Paul.Baumgartel@xxxxxxx; frits.hoogland@xxxxxxxxx;
niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx; Freek.DHooge@xxxxxxxxx;
oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: a quick poll regarding the 11gR2 OFA
Hi all,
with all the arguments pro and con different mount points I have to say
I love ASM.
All I need in 11.2 RAC is Grid Infrastructure and a (possibly shared)
RDBMS home. These can go to /u01/ or wherever people fancy. Then all
data files, data pump exports, data guard broker config files, control
files, ORLs, SRLs, flashback logs (and many more) can go to +DATA and
+FRA or whatever you named your disk groups. Brilliant-and it takes a
lot more to do a rm -rf in asmcmd than on the file system :). Once it
gets to a stable state you could even use ASM Cluster File System for
your storage needs.
My only concern is that it's difficult to adhere to a single ORACLE_BASE
in RAC 11.2.
On 05/12/2010 05:36 AM, Cary Millsap wrote:
> Paul's right; that was /exactly/ the point. People were naming mount
> points to connote the contents of those mount point; for example,
> they'd
[]
> http://carymillsap.blogspot.com
>
>
Regards,
Martin
--
Martin Bach
OCM 10g
http://martincarstenbach.wordpress.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/martincarstenbach
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
