RE: ZFS & Oracle
- From: "Connor McDonald" <mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:15:05 +0800
I might be wrong, but I think the "3/4 performance of UFS" was from a blog
where that was the ZFS that would be arriving with Solaris 11. So "current"
ZFS was not at that level of "performance" yet.
Cheers
Connor
>>> I think that somewhere in one of those articles I saw comparison to UFS
(with direct IO) and that was ZFS performance=3/4 UFS performance, so UFS
wins
Regards
Remigiusz
--
--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: ZFS & Oracle
- From: Remigiusz Sokolowski
Other related posts:
- » ZFS & Oracle
- » Re: ZFS & Oracle
- » RE: ZFS & Oracle
- » Re: ZFS & Oracle
- » Re: ZFS & Oracle
- » Re: ZFS & Oracle
- » Re: ZFS & Oracle
- » RE: ZFS & Oracle
- » RE: ZFS & Oracle
- » Re: ZFS & Oracle
- Re: ZFS & Oracle
- From: Remigiusz Sokolowski