Re: ZFS & Oracle
- From: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:22:58 +0100
To be fair to SUN, my experience is that anytime *anyone* thinks "gee
there's a cool idea lets go XXXX" performance drops through the floor.
Sooner or later one gets it back again. I think I stopped suggesting new
versions of Oracle for precisely this reason around about 9.0.1/9.0.3. :(
Niall
On 9/24/07, Connor McDonald <mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> One of the servers here is running Oracle, and the sys admins (keen as
> they
> are) thought "Gee, there's a cool idea...lets go ZFS"...at which point
> performance has dropped through the floor.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Joe Frohne
> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 11:08 PM
> To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: ZFS & Oracle
>
> Hello,
>
> I searched the archives for general ZFS information and found a few
> threads
> about ZFS and snapshots. These threads are about a year old. I am
> wondering if there is any general impression of running Oracle 10.2.xunder
> ZFS today. Are people doing it successfully? What are the good, the bad
> and the ugly of running Oracle under ZFS?
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe Frohne
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
Other related posts:
