RE: XML databases

On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:38, Jacques Kilchoer wrote:
> To be fair, they are comparing a just-released version of Oracle with a
> version of SQL Server that is almost four years old.=20
> 

I don't think the test was unfair.

The test was conducted with the latest available
release of SQL Server. The fact that it's four years
old is irrelevant in this case, because that is
all they have to offer.

And all they *will* have to offer for at least a year.

Jared


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: