On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:38, Jacques Kilchoer wrote: > To be fair, they are comparing a just-released version of Oracle with a > version of SQL Server that is almost four years old.=20 > I don't think the test was unfair. The test was conducted with the latest available release of SQL Server. The fact that it's four years old is irrelevant in this case, because that is all they have to offer. And all they *will* have to offer for at least a year. Jared ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------