It seems that either the query is wrong, or your email (1st paragraphe, about int_num values) is wrong, otherwise how come the rowsource says that you have 0 rows returned from the index range scan? On 9/18/07, Alvaro Jose Fernandez <alvaro.fernandez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Vivek > > > > During an Internal Benchmark Run, following SQL Query is using the Wrong > index idx_inst_num which has very Low Cardinality.ALL Rows of the Table > have inst_num value = '89651' (1 Constant Value). > > > > Have you evaluated dropping this index? > > > > Usage of Unique index IDX_INW_CLG_INST_TABLE would be preferred over > idx_inst_num index as Cardinality of (sol_id, zone_code, zone_date, > zone_srl_num, bank_id ) Combination is much better than (inst_num) > > > > NOTE - ICI Table is partitioned on SOL_ID field & has only 81636 Rows. > > > > *Qs Will Creating Histogram on inst_num field make the optimizer avoid > usage of the respective idx_inst_num index choose the Correct index i.e. > IDX_INW_CLG_INST_TABLE ? Any Other Ideas?* > > NOTE – SQL Code Change can Not be made. > > > > *Indexes on ICI Table:-* > > Unique IDX_INW_CLG_INST_TABLE index – Locally Prefixed Partitioned Index - > (sol_id, zone_code, zone_date, zone_srl_num, bank_id ) > > idx_inst_num index - (inst_num) > > > > would you mind to send an 10053 excerpt for the "table stats" and "SINGLE > TABLE ACCESS PLAN" for this query, so we can look further? > > maybe the clustering factor or other stats of idx_inst_num is beating the > other index, etc. > > > > Thanks indeed > > > > P.S. SQL Query > > > > SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ICI > > WHERE ICI.BANK_ID = '01' > > AND SOL_ID = '0049' > > AND ZONE_CODE = 'PECINW0008' > > AND ZONE_DATE = TO_DATE( '08-05-2003' ,'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') > > AND INST_NUM = '89651' > > > > Misses in library cache during parse: 0 > > Optimizer mode: CHOOSE > > Parsing user id: 35 (TBAADM) > > > > Rows Row Source Operation > > ------- --------------------------------------------------- > > 1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=87 us) > > 0 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID INW_CLG_INST_TABLE PARTITION: > 2 2 (cr=3 pr=0 p > > w=0 time=70 us) > > 0 INDEX RANGE SCAN *IDX_INST_NUM* (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=65 > us)(object id 28758) > > > > the above performance is bad ? (87us, cr=3) > **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** > This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended > solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original > message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail > or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This > e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to > minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a > result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus > checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right > to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this > e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored > on the Infosys e-mail system. > ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS*** >