RE: Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance" is a myth?
- From: "Jacques Kilchoer" <Jacques.Kilchoer@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:18:56 -0700
So it is possible in recent versions! I just assumed it wasn't because =
of the allowed values for DB_nK_cache_size for creating a tablespace =
with a different blocksize.
One thing that would definitely give you an error in 8.1 was that if you =
have a locally managed autoallocate tablespace you were unable to create =
any object in it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Niall Litchfield=20
Jonathan wrote
> I believe Stephan Haisley has built a 9i database
> with a 7.5K block size (not for production reasons,
> of course).
SYS 27-APR-04@block>show parameter block
NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- =
----------------------------
db_block_buffers integer 0
db_block_checking boolean FALSE
db_block_checksum boolean TRUE
db_block_size integer 5120
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16
SYS 27-APR-04@block>show release
release 1001000200
SYS 27-APR-04@block>
5 and 10 are such round numbers I thought I might choose the highest =
common divisor for my block size...
if anyone has suggestions as to how to achieve interesting errors with =
this setup the db will be around for a day or so.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
