Re: Which one is good in terms of performance
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: tim@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:46:24 -0700
Thanks Tim, very thorough and detailed work as usual. I am of course
pleased to see my opinion confirmed, obtained from casual observation
but not hardened by rigorous testing, that you can get away with a
rather low sampling rates for table statistics without sacrificing much
in accuracy, but the same is not true for index statistics and
histograms and that one should therefore separate the gathering of table
statistics (including basic column statistics "for all columns size 1")
from index statistics and histograms. Unless you can afford a full table
compute.
Tim Gorman wrote:
> Seema and Wolfgang,
> Here is some info I generated recently, to add to the discussion...
>
> My apologies for the length of the post, but feel free to delete if not
> interested...
>
>
--
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: Which one is good in terms of performance
- From: Tim Gorman
Other related posts:
- » Which one is good in terms of performance
- » RE: Which one is good in terms of performance
- » Re: Which one is good in terms of performance
- » RE: Which one is good in terms of performance
- » Re: Which one is good in terms of performance
- » Re: Which one is good in terms of performance
- » Re: Which one is good in terms of performance
- » RE: Which one is good in terms of performance
- » Re: Which one is good in terms of performance
- Re: Which one is good in terms of performance
- From: Tim Gorman