RE: Very high buffer gets

  • From: fairlie rego <fairlie_r@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nnahata@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:22:22 -0800 (PST)

Hi Naveen
   
  Isn't this the same issue as described in Metalink note 310923.1
   
  Regards,
  Fairlie

"Nahata, Naveen (US - Glen Mills)" <nnahata@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
      9.2.0.6 (on HP-UX)

    
---------------------------------
  From: Alex Gorbachev [mailto:gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 4:07 PM
To: Nahata, Naveen (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Very high buffer gets


  
If I recall correctly this is a bug in AQ handling. I think you should be able 
to find it easilly on Metalink. I think Oracle attributes LIO that is caused by 
QMN during queue maintenance (delayed purging) instead of attributing those 
LIOs to the statements causing it. What is your version? 

  2006/2/13, Nahata, Naveen (US - Glen Mills) <nnahata@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:   Hi All,

After tracing the QMON process which was doing lots of buffer gets, I
found this culprit. None of the three tables involved in the query have 
more than 2 blocks. I know the nested loop is iterating over the blocks
but that should still not account for more than 200 blocks / execution.
Why do I see such high values for buffer gets?

select t.schema , t.name, t.flags, q.name
from
system.aq$_queue_tables t, sys.aq$_queue_table_affinities aft,
system.aq$_queues q where aft.table_objno = t.objno and
aft.owner_instance =
  :1 and        q.table_objno = t.objno and q.usage = 0 and
bitand(t.flags, 4+16+32+64+128+256) = 0       and NOT       ( t.name
in
('DEF$_AQCALL' , 'DEF$_AQERROR') and t.schema = 'SYSTEM')for update of 
t.name, aft.table_objno skip locked


call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current
rows
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 
----------
Parse       84      0.00       0.03          0          0          0
0
Execute     84      0.03       0.03          0          0          0
0
Fetch       84     11.87      47.87        266     536288      45281 
4627
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
----------
total      252     11.90      47.94        266     536288      45281
4627

Misses in library cache during parse: 1 
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS   (recursive depth: 1)

Rows     Row Source Operation
-------  ---------------------------------------------------
    60  FOR UPDATE
    62   HASH JOIN
    59    NESTED LOOPS
    59     TABLE ACCESS FULL AQ$_QUEUE_TABLES
    59     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID AQ$_QUEUE_TABLE_AFFINITIES
    59      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN AQ$_QTABLE_AFFINITIES_PK (object id 2400)
    64    TABLE ACCESS FULL AQ$_QUEUES 

Naveen


This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information 
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. 


Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any 
action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l 






-- 
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev 


Fairlie Rego
Senior Oracle Consultant
Optus Telecommunications
www.optus.com.au
Mobile: +61 4 02 792 405
Home: +61 2 8920 0273

 
When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading.






                
---------------------------------
 
 What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos 

Other related posts: