Using CRS in Active - Passive Configuration

From: "John Thompson" <jhthomp@xxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:59:10 -0500

I'm currently testing a 3 node RH Linux active/passive cluster.  We have 4
db's running on 1 node, 4 db's running on the 2nd node and using the 3rd as
the passive node.  Using ASM for storage.  This is working really nice
especially for managebility purposes as it takes only 1 command and just a
matter of minutes to move a db from 1 node to another.  I was wondering if
anyone else is doing this sort of thing and if so, have you had any
problems?

3 Dell 2950's w/32gb memory each running Redhat Linux 4 U 6.  Using
11.1.0.6for CRS and ASM.  Different flavors of 10.2 for the databases

Follow-Ups:

Re: Using CRS in Active - Passive Configuration
From: LS Cheng

Using CRS in Active - Passive Configuration

Other related posts: