Re: Tuning SGA
- From: Bryan Wells <bunjibry@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: tomday2@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:08:20 -0700
im all in favor of your last point. however, having brand new box,
storage, etc, under a maintenance contract allows me 10 min. of sleep
at night.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:38:39 -0500, Thomas Day <tomday2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would run STATSPACK and only make changes in response to specific
> problems. It's nice to have the growth area for when you need it.
>
> There was a discussion a while ago to the effect that just throwing a
> faster CPU or a larger SGA at a problem without diagnosing a specific
> fix can sometimes make the problem worse.
>
> If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
--
Bryan S Wells - DBA Newbie
bunjibry@xxxxxxxxx
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Tuning SGA
- From: Bryan Wells
- Re: Tuning SGA
- From: Robert Blok
- Re: Tuning SGA
- From: Paul Drake
- Re: Tuning SGA
- From: Thomas Day
Other related posts:
- » Re: Tuning SGA
- » Re: Tuning SGA
- » Tuning SGA
- » Re: Tuning SGA
- » Re: Tuning SGA
- » Re: Tuning SGA
- » Re: Tuning SGA
- » Re: Tuning SGA
- » Re: Tuning SGA
- Tuning SGA
- From: Bryan Wells
- Re: Tuning SGA
- From: Robert Blok
- Re: Tuning SGA
- From: Paul Drake
- Re: Tuning SGA
- From: Thomas Day