Re: Thoughts on crs installation on HP-UX
- From: Dan Norris <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:15:24 -0600
Conversely, I don't know why you'd use SG+CRS if you're doing
active/passive, since CRS by itself is a perfectly respectable HA clustering
solution :). With CRS and ASM-managed database storage, there's nothing
you'd be missing. If you aren't using ASM, though, you'd have to use RAW
devices or some other cluster filesystem since OCFS isn't available on HPUX.
Dan
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Matthew Zito <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Actually, if you didn't want to pay for ServiceGuard, you could use CRS
> alone for either case: active-active (RAC), or active-passive. I'm not sure
> why you'd use SG+CRS if you're doing active/passive, since SG is by itself a
> perfectly respectable HA active/passive clustering solution.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> --
> Matthew Zito
> Chief Scientist
> GridApp Systems
> P: 646-452-4090
> mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gridapp.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of D'Hooge Freek
> Sent: Fri 1/23/2009 6:20 AM
> To: sxmte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Thoughts on crs installation on HP-UX
>
> Maureen,
>
> If you are talking about active-passive clustering, then you don't need crs
> (don't even think you can use it).
> If you are talking about active-active clustering then you need rac (and
> thus crs).
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Freek D'Hooge
> Uptime
> Oracle Database Administrator
> email: freek.dhooge@xxxxxxxxx
> tel +32(0)3 451 23 82
> http://www.uptime.be
>
>
>
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
