Haven't yet - going to continue as is I think and see what else shakes=20 out of the "inefficient query" tree, but that's a thought for future=20 reference.... Steve -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 3:09 PM To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: The Oracle 9.2.0.4 Optimizer - are there problems with it? Did you tried setting OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE to 9.2.0.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------