Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- From: "Dennis Williams" <oracledba.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: chughhk@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:06:27 -0600
Chugh,
My requirements is also similar where I have to refresh the lower regions
> (databases - development,system,acceptance etc.) from production data but
> not the functions,procedures,packages etc. very frequently. I use exp, and
> imp data after disabling triggers,fk constraints and truncating tables.
>
The advantage of cloning techniques compared to export/import is that you
receive an exact replica of the production system. Why would you want to
exclude functions, procedures, packages, etc.? The idea is that before a
change is promoted to production it is tested against a current copy of
production. The worst circumstance is that you promote something to
production only to discover after much anguish that production has a
different version of a function, procedure, package, or etc. than the test
database.
Dennis Williams
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- From: hitender chugh
- References:
- RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- From: Daniel Fink
- RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- From: hitender chugh
Other related posts:
- » Testing Refresh Procedure
- » Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- » RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- Re: Testing Refresh Procedure
- From: hitender chugh
- RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- From: Daniel Fink
- RE: Testing Refresh Procedure
- From: hitender chugh