Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- From: "Andrew Kerber" <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:42:01 -0600
No, taf wont work that way. Your 3rd party provider would have to deal with
it.
On Jan 30, 2008 6:55 AM, hrishy <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Hmm how about using Oracle clusterware and build a
> active passive instance would that work ?
>
> regards
> Hrishy
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
Andrew W. Kerber
'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
- References:
- Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- From: LS Cheng
- Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- From: hrishy
Other related posts:
- » TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » RE: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- » RE: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- From: LS Cheng
- Re: TAF and node failover non RAC oracle 10.2
- From: hrishy