In what way does RAC (or any clustering solution, such as SFOR) protect
against such threats?
ken_nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Tim,
As Finn mentioned, I'm looking at this to provide HA. This is
for a location in SoCal, so its prone to earthquakes, and most
recently, wild fires.
Ken
--------------
Original message --------------
From: "Finn Jorgensen" <finn.oracledba@xxxxxxxxx>
Tim,
RAC/SFOR/HACMP/VCS etc are for high availability. Not disaster
recovery. As such, it's for the type of "disasters" that involve losing
1 server. Anything else you would need a DR setup to handle.
Finn
On 10/29/07, Tim Gorman <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well......out of all the
possible (and probable) range of faults and failures, exactly what
types of "disasters" does clustering such as RAC or SFOR protect
against?
ken_nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
>It has to be a very selective disaster for clustering
(i.e. RAC, HACMP, etc) to provide much protection.
Tim-
Sorry, I don't understand what that means.
Ken
--------------
Original message --------------
From: Tim Gorman <tim@xxxxxxxxx>
It has to be a very selective disaster for clustering (i.e. RAC, HACMP,
etc) to provide much protection.
ken_nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
Dan, thanks for the feedback.
We're trying to protect more than just the Oracle DB.
While CRS and Dataguard work well to provide HA, it doesn't take into
account the Siebel, IIS, etc installs that form the entire application
stack.
With this solution, we're hoping to lower the TCO in
the event of a disaster.
Ken
--------------
Original message --------------
From: Dan Norris <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I
have used the SFOR previously, but not on the current versions and not
with 10g DB. I had no problems with the SFOR software.
If I were implementing a cluster today with 10g, I wouldn't use any
non-Oracle clusterware. Instead, I'd just use Oracle Clusterware as it
provides all the HA you'll need for the DB. Maybe you have other
reasons for using SFOR...I hope you do because I couldn't justify the
investment given the current architecture.
Others have posted similarly on this list and in OTN forums as well.
Dan
-----
Original Message ----
From: Ken Nguyen <ken_nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:46:05 AM
Subject: Symantec Storage Foundation for Oracle RAC
We¢re looking to
implement Symantec Storage Foundation HA for Oracle RAC to offer HA for
our Oracle 10g RAC on RHEL.
Oracle has fully
certified most of the components within this Symantec solution, except
for the automatic failover piece (GCO).
This component is
certified on all platforms except for Red Hat, could have something to
do with Oracle¢s OEL initiative.
Is anyone using this or
any other Symantec SF products without any issues?
Ken
-- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
|