RE: Storage array advice anyone?
- From: "Johnson, George" <GJohnson@xxxxxxx>
- To: "'jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Oracle-L <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:45:26 -0000
So would you say that "storage virtualisation" is this another
gimmick from the marketing dept of the storage manufacturers, being used to
pull the wool over our eyes, to shift units?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Lewis [mailto:jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 17 Dec 2004 9:23
To: Oracle-L
Subject: Re: Storage array advice anyone?
Sorry to come in so late on this one - I've
had a busy three months, and only just got
back to reading the mail.
Personally I find the whole 'virtualization' thing a
complete con-trick.
Sure, I now have a LUN which is really 50
different spindles - so what good is that if I
send a 'single read request' and that activates
eight of them. It only takes 8 requests like
that and there are 64 reads queued up somewhere,
and who knows where they might be ? Ask
Cary Millsap about queueing and unstable
response times. (Then ask Stephen Barr what
the minimum and maximum response times were
for his Parallel Query problem).
And another thought - I've got a LUN which
has 50 different spindles. Using reasonably
modern discs, that's probably around 4TB of
spindles. How many other databases are going
to hitting those spindles ? That's what I asked
the DBA's at a site recently when there 56GB
database was on a 4TB SAN. Their S/A was
insisting that the SAN has no performance issues -
the database had recorded its first 3-second
'db file sequential read' time just fifteen minutes
after I reset the wait times.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated Sept 19th
----- Original Message -----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Matthew Zito
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 12:54 AM
To: Oracle-L
Subject: Re: Storage array advice anyone?
-Virtualization/abstraction of storage objects - when the LUN you are
sending I/Os to is comprised of chunks from 50 different spindles from
10 different RAID-5 groups, the performance is excellent.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
****************************************************************************
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
****************************************************************************
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
