RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- From: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:51:15 -0700
20 seems like a lot to me...thanks for the feedback
>>>But I'll admit that the thought of swinging 80 databases
>>>from production site to standby site and then back again is
>>>a little daunting, depending on how many DBAs you have to do
>>>the work.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?