Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>
- To: "ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 22:00:53 +0100
Hi Christo,
What's the _smm_max_size value for your session? It states the max workarea
size for a serial session in kB (and defaults to 5% of
pga_aggregate_target).
But if you want so big PGA memory areas, it might be worth using manual
workarea for those sessions anyway...
Tanel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christo Kutrovsky" <kutrovsky.oracle@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
> Tanel,
>
> I've noticed that the growth of memory is done in steps. And those
> steps become progressivelly large, until it can no longer allocate
> memory.
>
> Even on 64 bit systems, a single workarea is limited to 4 gb. And
> because of this step allocations, allocation actually stops at arround
> 3.5 gb (instead of just under 4gb).
>
> Have you found any way to control the step, or at least the maximum
> step during step allocation ?
>
> I wonder when they will start to support the Linux hugetlb pool for pga
> mem=
> ory.
>
> I've noticed that it will never de-allocate the memory, if you are
> under your pga_aggregate_target. But once you start using it in
> another process, it will de-allocate it.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Christo Kutrovsky
- References:
- RE: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Boivin, Patrice J
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Christo Kutrovsky
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: zhu chao
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Christo Kutrovsky
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Tanel Põder
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Christo Kutrovsky
Other related posts:
- » Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » RE: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- » Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Christo Kutrovsky
- RE: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Boivin, Patrice J
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Christo Kutrovsky
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: zhu chao
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Christo Kutrovsky
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Tanel Põder
- Re: Shrinking PGA of snp processes
- From: Christo Kutrovsky