Re: Should Advanced Replication be considered for High Availability solutions?

From: David Sharples <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Oracle-l <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:09:38 +0100

http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:14672061404704

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:42:25 +0200, Giovanni Cuccu <gcuccu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>        my company asked me for evaluating High Availability solutions using
> various Oracle features. I considered RAC and Stand-by solutions
> eventually combined together (RAC at the local site and standby in a
> remote site), but I don't know if even Advanced Replication
> (multimaster) can be considered as a viable alternative.
> Any suggestions/real world experiences?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

References:

Should Advanced Replication be considered for High Availability solutions?
From: Giovanni Cuccu

Re: Should Advanced Replication be considered for High Availability solutions?

Other related posts: