Re: Self-Healing ORA-01578's

  • From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:18:58 +0300

> Did you perhaps run dbverify while the database was up?
> Because if you did, the results are not necessarily trustworthy.

I think in 9i dbv is able to re-read the block if it's header & tail don't
match, thus not reporting false-corruptions anymore.
Also, if a block's header & tail don't match even on re-reads, but the block
keeps changing, the block is reported as being in flux, not corrupt...


Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
Archives are at
FAQ is at

Other related posts: