RE: SQLLDR or UTL_FILE package? Which is faster?

If you can do parallel direct loads it would be tough to beat SQL Loader.
Clear back in '98 using Oracle 7.3.4 I was getting 15000 rows per second.
I'm sure with the hardware and SAN systems available today you could beat
that by a large margin. 
 
I'm looking forward to hearing from anyone who has more current benchmarks
than mine.
 
    -Randy
 

   _____  

From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ram Srinivasan
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 4:55 PM
To: Oracle-L
Subject: RE: SQLLDR or UTL_FILE package? Which is faster?


All:
  Is SQLLDR faster or UTL_FILE utility faster?
  For loads of 130 million rows with about 200 columns, which tool is
better?
  We are on 8.1.7 on Sun server.
 
  Thanks for your input.

-- 
Sincerely
Ram Srinivasan
Charlottesville, VA. 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.15/848 - Release Date: 6/13/2007
12:50 PM



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.15/848 - Release Date: 6/13/2007
12:50 PM

Other related posts: