Re: SQL programming fundamentals

  • From: "Toon Koppelaars" <toon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rjoralist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:39:44 +0200

>Rich wrote:
>"relational theory knowledge is akin to needing to understand the internal
combustion engine in order to drive"

I disagree.

This is like stating that the endusers of database applications need to know
relational theory.
They do *not*, of course.

I see,  you correct yourself later on:
>"I think I *am* in favor of that requirement if the SQL professional is
designing (* database) software"
(*) insert by me.


If SQL professionals would know about the underlying theories, then a lot (a
real huge big lot) of FUD in our profession would disappear.

<rant>
This FUD gave us Java.
And boy, aren't we happy about that?
</rant>

-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Toon Koppelaars
RuleGen BV
+31-615907269
toon_at_rulegen_dot_com
www_dot_rulegen_dot_com

Author: "Applied Mathematics for Database Professionals"

Other related posts: