Re: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- From: "LS Cheng" <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle.tutorials@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:44:29 +0200
Hi
you might want to have a look at these ML notes
Note:396940.1
Note:270097.1
Note:274496.1
Thanks
--
LSC
On 8/30/07, DBA Deepak <oracle.tutorials@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> Have a doubt on the SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS parameter. If we set this
> parameter to some higher value is there a chance that the shared pool will
> get fragmented because of this parameter setting? If yes, then am just
> curious to know how?
>
> Some articles say if we have a fragmented shared pool then we may consider
> decreasing this parameter value. In this case why Oracle will not be able to
> free-up the memory occupied by the cached cursors when space is required in
> the shared pool for incoming SQLs.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Deepak
> Oracle DBA
>
- References:
- SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- From: DBA Deepak
Other related posts:
- » SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » RE: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » RE: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » Re: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » Re: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » Re: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » Re: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » Re: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » Re: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- » Re: SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- SESSION_CACHED_CURSORS
- From: DBA Deepak