Re: SAP Reorgs

If a reorg has to be done, there's a much more basic way of
accomplishing the goal than all these discussions seem to indicate.

See http://www.datadocktorn.nu/us_frag1.php which Michael Möller of
Miracle found yesterday.

No fun without risc
When you reorg your disc

Mogens

Tim Gorman wrote:
> I¹m kind of confused about why there is any discussion about this topic...
> Reorgs are bad, bad, bad.  You need downtime to accomplish them, else a
> non-trivial amount of preparation and cleverness (or an expensive 3rd-party
> product) to avoid that downtime.  As someone remarked earlier in this
> thread, we wouldn¹t be having a discussion on reorgs if they were painless.
> But they are painful (by varying degrees), so it is prudent to quantify the
> benefits before expending the effort and incurring the risk, right?  They
> certainly do not fall into the realm of ³best practice², I think we can
> agree?
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: