RE: SAN storage
- From: "Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)" <Thomas.Mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <p4cldba@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:52:55 -0500
I agree with Andrew. I worked with EMC and IBM Shark on Sun and both
work just fine. SAN disk is becoming a commodity. Cheaper, faster &
better.
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Kerber
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:49 AM
To: p4cldba@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Oracle List
Subject: Re: SAN storage
There are only three factors, in whatever order is important to you:
-speed, price, and reliability.
I have worked with EMC and Hitachi on Solaris, and been happy with both.
On Feb 5, 2008 5:55 PM, Prasad <p4cldba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,
I have a Oracle 10gR2 database on Solaris 9 which is going to be
few TB in 6 months time . and my manager wants me to come up with some
recommendation for a SAN storage .so Please advise me on what you think
can be a best storage solution
and also what are the key factors that one should look into
before deciding on which SAN vendors to choose from?
Thanks in Advance
regards
_Prasad
--
Andrew W. Kerber
'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: SAN storage
- From: Matthew Zito
- References:
- Re: SAN storage
- From: Andrew Kerber
Other related posts:
- » SAN storage
- » Re: SAN storage
- » RE: SAN storage
- » Re: SAN storage
- » RE: SAN storage
- » Re: SAN storage
- RE: SAN storage
- From: Matthew Zito
- Re: SAN storage
- From: Andrew Kerber