Zhu Even if you go for Vertas Storage Foundation for RAC, you still need to use CRS stack from 10g onwards. So, you will have two clusterwares running and I don't prefer that way. I have a client running VCS + CRS + 4node RAC. I can tell you, in case of failures, it is very hard to understand who initiated the issue. I think, my preference is to keep it simple: ASM + RAC + CRS stack. And Yes, we administer CRS stack. Cheers Riyaj Shamsudeen Principal DBA, Ora!nternals - http://www.orainternals.com Specialists in Performance, Recovery and EBS11i Blog: http://orainternals.wordpress.com On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Zhu,Chao <zhuchao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks LS/Vit; > > One more question, for those RAC system that runs oracle CRS, does DBA > manage the CRS, or the Unix Admin (storage guys) manage the CRS? > > For activities like Storage migration, if we use veritas volume manager > *maybe* we can do volume migration from old storage to new storage using > volume mirror, with ASM for those non-asm disks like voting disk, i guess > we have to do them during outage maintenance? > > Thx > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:34 PM, vit.spinka <vit.spinka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> > Seems that in 11gR2 you can use DBFS for utl_file however it is only >> available for Linux and not 100% certain that DBFS will be released for >> other platforms in this Release (except Windows) >> >> 11gR2 also brings ACFS, that is cluster filesystem atop of ASM. 11gR2 for >> Solaris is still hot from the printing press, so I can't confirm it supports >> ACFS, but I suppose it should, it is advertised as multi-platform. >> Thus - frankly, I don't see much point in not using Oracle clusterware >> (eh, sorry, Oracle Grid Infratructure:-), ,marketing is again changing the >> names). >> >> Vit Spinka >> > > > > -- > Regards > Zhu Chao > www.cnoug.org > >