RE: Resized overflow buffer to xxxK (for xxxxK LWN) in trace file
- From: "John Hallas" <john.hallas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <GuangMei@xxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:29:11 +0100
Looks like it could be an existing or new bug associated with redo log
corruption
See info on bugs 6270459 and 5688052
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guang Mei
Sent: 26 September 2007 22:06
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Resized overflow buffer to xxxK (for xxxxK LWN) in trace file
We are running oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris 5.10
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
----------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
But in udump directory, I see lots of small trace files, and typically
it has something like
*** 2007-09-19 08:59:23.924
*** ACTION NAME:() 2007-09-19 08:59:23.917
*** MODULE NAME:(SQL*Plus) 2007-09-19 08:59:23.917
*** SERVICE NAME:(DS10ORA2) 2007-09-19 08:59:23.917
*** SESSION ID:(1000.8924) 2007-09-19 08:59:23.917
Resized overflow buffer to 10240K (for 9352K LWN)
Resized overflow buffer to 9216K (for 8235K LWN)
Resized overflow buffer to 9216K (for 8310K LWN)
*** 2007-09-19 09:02:28.434
Resized overflow buffer to 10240K (for 9352K LWN)
Resized overflow buffer to 9216K (for 8235K LWN)
Resized overflow buffer to 9216K (for 8310K LWN)
Does anyone know why I am getting these? I am curious what the root
cause is.
Thanks.
Guang
BJSS Limited, 1st Floor Coronet House, Queen Street, Leeds LS1 2TW.
Registered in England with company number 2777575.
http://www.bjss.co.uk
Other related posts:
