RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?

From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Riyaj Shamsudeen" <rshamsud@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:25:31 -0700

Yep, it's an EMC.  My Unix admin just told me earlier today that EMC told him 
that they recommend keeping the filesystems below 90% full to avoid any 
problems.  I had never heard anything like that before - anyone else?  This is 
a 500GB filesystem, so to keep it below 90% we're talking about wasting 50GB.  
Not the end of the world, I know, but certainly not ideal and I can't believe 
that this would actually be a requirement for stability.


-----Original Message-----
From: Riyaj Shamsudeen [mailto:rshamsud@xxxxxxxxxxxx]


I don't know much about NFS3 protocol, but is your vendor / file system 
in this list ?

http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/htdocs/vendors_nfs.html


Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or 
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not 
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and 
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business 
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
  - From: Binley Lim

RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?

Other related posts: