RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Riyaj Shamsudeen" <rshamsud@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:36:53 -0700
It is NFS3 - details below:
/baan4 ->mount|grep -e mounted -e --- -e baan4db
node mounted mounted over vfs date options
-------- --------------- --------------- ------ ------------ ---------------
gbtnas01 /baan4db /baan4 nfs3 Feb 12 21:29
rw,bg,hard,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,vers=3,proto=tcp,biods=24
Please let me know if you see any problems with the above config.
Thanks,
Brandon
-----Original Message-----
From: Riyaj Shamsudeen [mailto:rshamsud@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 12:14 PM
To: Allen, Brandon
Cc: Binley Lim; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
What type of file system are you using for your redo log files ? Is there
any special mount options in use ? While I agree with the solution as
point-in-time recovery for online redo log corruption, but out-of-space error
as a cause, does not fit for redo log files.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- From: Riyaj Shamsudeen
Other related posts:
- » Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- » RE: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- Re: Recovery with logs, then incremental, then more logs?
- From: Riyaj Shamsudeen