Re[2]: That crazy CBO.....
- From: Jonathan Gennick <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Bobak, Mark" <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:16:33 -0400
Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 4:57:01 PM, Bobak, Mark
(Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
BM> AAAAARRRRRRGGGHHHHH!
BM> Bitten by AUTOTRACE again! It LIED to me!
<snippage>
BM> Ok, ok, I should know better by now, AUTOTRACE CANNOT BE TRUSTED!!
BM> It should be removed from the database! It's too tempting, due to ease
BM> of use! =20
I'd argue that Oracle should fix it. One shouldn't have to
bother with something as cumbersome as 10046 trace just to
see an execution plan. I don't even like having to query the
plan table (or use dbms_xplan) from SQL*Plus. The front end
should do all that crud for me. Just MHO.
Best regards,
Jonathan Gennick --- Brighten the corner where you are
http://Gennick.com * 906.387.1698 * mailto:jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Join the Oracle-article list and receive one
article on Oracle technologies per month by
email. To join, visit http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/oracle-article,
or send email to Oracle-article-request@xxxxxxxxxxx and
include the word "subscribe" in either the subject or body.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: That crazy CBO.....
- From: Bobak, Mark
Other related posts:
- » Re[2]: That crazy CBO.....
- » Re[2]: That crazy CBO.....
- » RE: Re[2]: That crazy CBO.....
- RE: That crazy CBO.....
- From: Bobak, Mark