Re: Re: hash join and nested loop join in an oltp query
- From: <ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 16:19:48 -0400
no. I have seen them recently with range scans on both tables. I think it might
be because I have filters on table A, which returns only a small number of
records, then it hashes the large table and scans with a range scan.
I never saw this in 8i. how much did they change the CBO in 9?
>
> From: Mladen Gogala <mladen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2004/05/04 Tue PM 03:04:28 EDT
> To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: hash join and nested loop join in an oltp query
>
>
> On 05/04/2004 02:43:13 PM, ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > what types of cases make hash joins superior to nested loops? I see them
> > alot in batch processing when I need > to join most of the rows, but I am
> > see them now when I return a small subset of rows.
>
> Well, if you have to use full table scan to retrieve rows from one of the
> tables,
> there is a strong probability that hash join will be
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
- » Re: Re: hash join and nested loop join in an oltp query