Re: Re: HCC in Pillar Storage
- From: Tim Hall <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: tanel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:19:36 +0000
RE: "The whole game is pure marketing"
Indeed. HCC was part of the regular EE database product in the beta,
but was later rebranded as an Exadata-only option, making Exadata more
attractive to potential customers. Now the recent patch allows you to
have ZFS/Pillar also, because they are Oracle revenue streams also.
As you've already heard, there are some advantages to running HCC on
Exadata, but there is no technical reason it can't be run on any
storage. If Oracle flipped the switch, we could all have it. :)
I have no problem with this situation. It's Oracle's business how the
license their code. I just get a bit annoyed when you read marketing
crap that implies there's a technical reason for it. There is not.
It's purely marketing.
Cheers
Tim...
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Tanel Poder <tanel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry about double-post, mail trouble!
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Tanel Poder <tanel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Oracle supports HCC on Exadata and from 11.2.0.3 onwards on Oracle's (Sum)
>> ZFS appliance and Pillar. Obviously on non-Exadata the *de*compression
>> always happens at the database layer (on Exadata it depends on a number of
>> things). The compression always happens in the database layer on both
>> Exadata and non-Exadata.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
