RE: RMAN Incremental merge
- From: Andy Rivenes <rivenes1@xxxxxxxx>
- To: Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Rob.Dempsey@xxxxxxxxxx" <Rob.Dempsey@xxxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:31:45 -0800
I've done this in the past and we're considering it again in the
group I'm currently working for. It's referred to as an incrementally
updated backup in the documentation. I've never heard the term
"incremental merge" but it looks like the same thing. I think that
with block change tracking it isn't a bad way to go if you have
enough online disk space to allocate to the FRA. It certainly has
some advantages over a traditional RMAN backup strategy for very
large databases. The other caveat is using ASM with the FRA to get
"automatic" space management. In 10.1 this wasn't always so
automatic, and I haven't used it in 10.2 or 11 (yet), but it does work.
At 10:16 AM 11/26/2008, Allen, Brandon wrote:
I'm not 100% positive, but I believe the answer to all 3 questions
is "yes". Maybe this will help:
<http://
download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14192/bkup004.htm#BRBSC186>http://
download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14192/bkup004.htm#BRBSC186
Regards,
Brandon
Other related posts: